Posts, a community app by Read.cv

Thread
 @
Replying to @jsiggy

what are your thoughts? I wanna hear em!

Jamie Sigadel

It just makes no sense to me for UI and UX to be decoupled in any context because you can't have one without the other.. Putting arbitrary numbers on things is just bizarre

 @
Replying to @jsiggy

I wonder if people are trying to add as many “related” words and increase the frequency of those words for ATS / recruiters. Seeing it on a portfolio can be janky, I expect people to write WHAT it was rather than vaguely UX/UI. idk what recruiters are looking for any more tho

Jamie Sigadel

So this was in a JD send to me by a third party recruiter and it definitely wasn't a standard JD because it mentioned things like "this would disqualify someone".. Details that are more like the recruiter's personal notes. Which I actually find helpful tbh

Jamie Sigadel

But in general I would say this kind of language is a red flag to me because it doesn't convey understanding of how design works

 @
Replying to @jsiggy

hahaha that is helpful, I’d love “you’d be disqualified if…” and I agree with you. Sorry it’s another jd for the trash tho 💜

Jamie Sigadel

I know, right? Maybe we need that to be standard with these JDs hahaha