Posts, a community app by Read.cv

Thread
Jamie Sigadel

Doing my part / Attempting to do my part

Taurean Bryant Not Found
Replying to @jsiggy

I’ve probably put 60 hours into them over the last 3-4mo. I used to turn them down and after this saga of my life will probably go back to that. They’re BS. I think there’s ways to maybe do them well but they almost never are.

Jamie Sigadel
Replying to @taurean

I haven't heard a great argument for why they're better than a portfolio review, tbh.. In this case the main reason seemed to be an equal playing field. But then it isn't *exactly* equal because it was supposed to be an app critique using an app of that person's choosing (c)

Taurean Bryant Not Found
Replying to @jsiggy

An exercise should be: - paid - includes research - includes existing design material your work integrates with - contextual to specific questions that an interviewer needs to evaluate that’s unique to their needs - internal documentation for criteria for reviewing

Jamie Sigadel
Replying to @taurean

I agree, especially with tailoring the test/sharing evaluation criteria.. But apparently that's asking too much lol You would think for there to be a test at all, there must be a grading system in place.. I'm guessing most of the time that's not actually true, though lol (c)

Jamie Sigadel
Replying to @taurean

But lbr, these tests are usually early in the process before there's even a chance to talk to anyone.. It seems to be a tool to eliminate as many people as possible more than anything else. It doesn't find the "best" person for the job

Taurean Bryant Not Found
Replying to @jsiggy

Oh interesting. I’ve only had them late in the process. Even now, as much as I need a job I won’t do one at the *start*. No way