Posts, a community app by Read.cv

Thread
Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @water

it's commercial art

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

Hot take: art *is* commercial (unfortunately) 🫠

Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @alicetragedy @water

ugh no but totally yes

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

Yeah I mean I grew up literally a stone’s throw from the Sistine Chapel 😝 but also I have a background in applied arts and worked in the art “industry” and it’s the worstttttt. So like you say it’s like “ugh no but totally yes” 🙈

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

(But I totally understand the sentiment, I do, because I would love to see art completely “removed” from capitalism and I think in some cases it is or can be)

Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @alicetragedy @water

in the olden days they called it commercial art which was purposeful and based on craft. then we got into calling it design and it became fancy and a bit conceited (thanks a lot apple). did you know michelangelo was paid 2m euros (roughly) to paint the ceiling?

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

Yes! Absolutely agree with everything you’re writing here. I think it’s a conversation too complex for this format but I’d love to know if you think that design and art can evolve and allow for multitudes. Should design always be purposeful?

Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @alicetragedy @water

yes design should have utility. otherwise it is art. somewhat related: this is a question we asked (me, i did!) in the very early days of the app store. someone submitted an "art" app (it did nothing but exist) and had no utility. we classified it as art, and acceptable. 🎉🥳

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

Wow! 🥳 Sooo… can we ask the same question in the other direction? Should art have no purpose in order to be defined as such? And where does political propaganda, for example, land on that spectrum? And is political propaganda different from the work of Banksy?

Laura 🦄
Replying to @spring @water

Maybe some of these are very obvious questions with obvious answers and I’m just spamming folks with my thoughts 😂🙈

Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @alicetragedy @water

these are fun questions. agitprop is utilitarian art. everything is political, the personal is political. the form a poor person fills was designed to make sure they fail so don't get government money. design is political. dark patterns are political (& financially rewarding!)

Spring 🏳️‍🌈
Replying to @alicetragedy @water

also of course EVERYTHING IS ART

David Mendes
Replying to @water

What do we say to designing a piece of communication that has no commercial purpose besides sharing a message? I think graphic design, in the context of pure communication design (even without a business purpose) is still design.

Jordan
Replying to @davidmendes

i would say the style of design you choose was most likely pioneered in the name of capitalism.

David Mendes
Replying to @water

Maybe... but I was more hinting at the fact that the differentiation between Art and Design is often not so clear. Maybe an art piece can also be designed. Maybe if it is researched, planed, and executed to deliver some value, art could also be considered design.

Dorian
Dorian @zuyos
Replying to @water

There is this one from Ruben Pater; valiz.nl/en/publication…

CAPS LOCK
Jordan
Replying to @zuyos

+rep good book share

Jordan

i feel like there’s a book on this